This great image is from a really interesting campaign by the Ministry of Defence, highlighting to members of the armed services the need to think carefully about anything they share online. The campaign is supported by videos, a website and a detailed set of Online Engagement Guidelines. All well worth a look.

It’s an extreme example perhaps, given the very specific risks service personnel face, but this sort of activity is something more organisations should be thinking about. It may seem like common sense but society as a whole is still working out exactly how to use and manage many of the new communication tools; just look at the twitter injunction controversy or the Facebook juror.

Organisations that want to protect their customers, their employees, their sensitive data and their valuable reputations would be well advised to spend some time ensuring everyone in their organisation is fully aware of the wider implications of using social media tools, exactly what is or isn’t acceptable and just how widely any of their online contributions can be seen.

 

Really interesting talk from Jeremiah Owyang on how to manage the inevitable increase in demand for social interaction. As Jeremiah says;

“We know that many companies are continuing to realize that social business does not scale in a 1:1 basis. Your customer voices will always outnumber the number of community managers you can hire. As a result, companies must invest in these following five programs:

  • Formalize a Hub and Spoke model
  • Become an enabler for business units
  • Scale with peer-to-peer communities
  • Formalize a customer advocacy program
  • Streamline workflow with SMMS.

Building Your Social Strategy: Prioritizing the Coming Year from Bazaarvoice on Vimeo.

 

A really useful presentation from Charlene Li, outlining the key elements that go into creating and delivering successful social media programmes.

 

 

Whilst organisations continue to  invest in the internal adoption of social technologies, it is becoming clear that, so far, only a few have worked out how to make the most of these new opportunities. McKinsey’s latest survey into the use of web 2.0 tools within organisations has identified the emergence of this new class of company – ‘The Networked Enterprise’.

Almost two-thirds of the businesses surveyed by McKinsey are now using social technologies to some degree, benefiting from quicker access to knowledge and internal experts, greater communication and operational efficiencies, increased employee satisfaction and greater levels of speed to market and subsequent success for product/service innovations.

However, as with any new technology, the rate of adoption and the ability to generate significant improvements varies enormously. McKinsey’s report identifies four major types of organisation -

Developing -The vast majority (79%) of organisations are still learning how best to deploy the new technologies. They are realising only modest improvements in business performance and have yet to develop significant usage or integrate tools into daily work flows, as a result they see little change in levels of communication, collaboration or information sharing.

Internally Networked Organisations – Some organisations (13%) focus primarily on using social tools within their company, resulting in higher levels of employee participation and greater integration into work-flows. The major benefits come from significantly more flexible internal processes; information shared more easily and less hierarchically, greater collaboration across silos and a more project-based approach to tasks.

Externally Networked Organisations - These companies (5%) achieve substantial benefits from using web 2.0 tools to connect with customers and business partners. They see benefits in marketing effectiveness and revenues but much less improvement in operational efficiencies and internal sharing and collaboration.

Fully Networked Enterprises – These are the elite organisations (just 3%) that are successfully integrating web 2.0 technologies throughout their operations; connecting the internal efforts of their employees and extending the company’s reach out to customers, partners and suppliers. As a result these organisations are seeing both sales growth through increased market share and higher margins through increased operational efficiency.

The benefits of the fully networked approach not only deliver competitive advantages now but provide the means for businesses to extend that advantage; lessons learned in one market, region or function can be quickly shared and adopted throughout the organisation, leading to faster innovation, greater organisational effectiveness and better products/services.

Key Steps to Becoming Fully Networked

The creation of effective networks, both internal and external, is quickly becoming an organisational necessity. If they aren’t already, senior managers everywhere need to be thinking about how they can enable their business…

  • Integrate the use of Web 2.0 into employees’ day-to-day work activities
  • Drive up levels of adoption and usage
  • Break down barriers to organisational change
  • Apply Web 2.0 technologies to interactions with customers, business partners and employees.

The ‘Networked Enterprises’ already have an advantage, the challenge for everyone else is to join them quickly or risk being left further behind.

 

Even now, there are plenty of examples of online communities that are failing to establish themselves and deliver the expected results. It is worth remembering therefore, that more often than not these failures can be traced to one or more of these common mistakes.

What should be clear, is that any new project needs a substantial commitment in both time and resources, and an understanding of the way communities develop, in order to avoid these mistakes.

1. If you build it, they will come.

Probably the most common  community fallacy. Too many organisations believe that simply rolling out a given technology (blogs, forums, wikis, etc.) will be enough to attract and engage users, who can the be left to develop a vibrant community. This can be attributed to the shiny attraction of “social software”, companies jumping at an application or platform rather than looking to provide value for their audiences.

2. Once it’s launched, we’re done.

Many communities launch successfully, only to fade out and disappear. This is often due to a failure in the planning stage to identify and secure ownership of the community and to have a strategy that lasts past “launch.”

3. Bigger is better.

It is often assumed that the overall size of a community is indicative of its success. However, a community’s value to its members  is more about the quality and relevance of engagement and content rather than numbers. This can be challenging for most community managers and businesses to understand, and is often contrary to what they’ve usually been told.

Digital Growth Trends 2010

 Posted by at 12:06 pm  Social Media  Tagged with:
Feb 072011
 

More interesting numbers showing major online trends in 2010, courtesy of Royal Pingdom and SMI.

Further evidence, if evidence was needed, of Facebook’s increased influence – more users, more sharing, more videos, more photos. Does it just keep growing or are we reaching the point when users start to look for smaller more specific networks rather than one big world for everyone?

  • 25 billion – Number of sent tweets on Twitter in 2010
  • 7.7 million – People following @ladygaga (Lady Gaga, Twitter’s most followed user).
  • 30 billion – Pieces of content (links, notes, photos, etc.) shared on Facebook per month.
  • 70% – Share of Facebook’s user base located outside the United States.
  • 20 million – The number of Facebook apps installed each day.
  • 2 billion – The number of videos watched per day on YouTube.
  • 35 – Hours of video uploaded to YouTube every minute.
  • 186 – The number of online videos the average Internet user watches in a month (USA).
  • 2+ billion – The number of videos watched per month on Facebook.
  • 20 million – Videos uploaded to Facebook per month.
  • 5 billion – Photos hosted by Flickr (September 2010).
  • 3000+ – Photos uploaded per minute to Flickr.
  • 130 million – At the above rate, the number of photos uploaded per month to Flickr.
  • 3+ billion – Photos uploaded per month to Facebook.
  • 36 billion – At the current rate, the number of photos uploaded to Facebook per year.